• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Management of loss of drilling fluid from an oil well bore is described in formations pierced by a drill head, under which elastic, graphite-shaped carbon particles with a d50 particle size between 10 µm and 2380 µm, an elasticity of more than ca. 130% rebound after compression at 68,948 kPa (10,000 psi), a degree of graphitization greater than 85% malt at d002 using XRD, an average pore size greater than 0.035 µm, and a dimension ratio of pores less than 0.63 to the drilling fluid.
    公开号:DK201600127U1
    申请号:DK201600127U
    申请日:2016-10-26
    公开日:2016-11-11
    发明作者:David J Derwin；Frank A Wawrzos；Changjun Zhou
    申请人:Superior Graphite Co；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    BACKGROUND ADDITIVE FOR LOSS CIRCULATION AND DRILL BACKGROUND Background In the oil and gas industry, a common problem with drilling activities is the loss of valuable drilling fluids in fractures induced by excessive dredging pressure, pre-existing porosity / fractures or large cavities in formation.
    One of the ways to prevent or stop such losses is through the application of granular particles to the drilling fluid, which acts as a bridging agent to establish a foundation for complete sealing of the fracture or as a well bore reinforcing material that holds the fracture open. Such materials include graphite, oil coke, walnut peel and calcium carbonate, among others.
    Superior Graphite Co. introduced elastic graphite-shaped carbon ("RGC") for use as a lost circulation material ("LCM") in the 1990s (see US 5,826,669, which is hereby incorporated by reference). As described herein, the elastic graphite is believed to be capable of being densely packed during compression in the pores and fractures of the formation and to be able to expand or contract without being loosened or collapsed due to changes in the corresponding circulation. ring density or by increasing the weight of the fluid. In addition, graphite acted as a solid lubricant to reduce wear in metal components and improve drilling efficiency.
    The graphite-shaped materials described in the '669 patent have an elasticity / recoil greater than 35% by compression at 10,000 psi with particle density from 1.45 to 2.2 g / cm 3. Such an RGC material for use as an LCM is commercially available under the trade name STEELSEAL® from Halliburton Inc. The STEELSEAL® additive is manufactured by Superior Graphite Co. and is considered standard practice in US 5,826,669. While such elastic graphite-shaped carbon materials have superior LC control, performance improvement is desirable.
    Summary
    The present invention relates to an improved resilient graphite carbon material and its use as LCM. While made by a process similar to that described in the '669 patent, the enhanced RGC has a particularly needle-like morphology with significantly greater elasticity, porosity and less density than the previously available elastic, graphite-shaped carbons. Testing of permeability plugging revealed that this enhanced RGC formed a better seal in itself and together with other lost circulation materials.
    More specifically, the improved RGC material has in one aspect a needle-like morphology that is substantially different from the STEELSEAL® product set forth above. The dimension ratio was measured at 0.60 for the improved high elastic material compared to STEELSEAL® 400 with 0.63 (spherical material has a dimensional ratio of 1). In another aspect, the improved RGC material has an elasticity in the range of 138 to 145% at 400 μιτι d so particle size compared to STEELSEAL® 400, whose elasticity is 100 to 130%. In a further aspect, the actual density of the improved material in the range is 1.49-1.53 g / cm 3 at 400 µm d50 particle size compared to the typical 1.56 - 1.62 g / cm 3 for STEELSEAL® 400. In another aspect, the degree of graphitization of the enhanced RGC is greater than 85% and samples have been measured with 87.9% for the improved RGC material compared to 79.8% for STEELSEAL® 400. In an even further aspect, the porosity was of the improved RGC material (represented by the total pore volume) measured at 0.43 cm3 / g compared to 0.24 cm3 / g for STEELSEAL® 400, or 76% higher.
    These aspects are described in more detail below.
    Detailed description
    The improved RGC material for use as an LCM in accordance with the present disclosure differs from known materials by some characteristics, including (but not necessarily limited to) porosity, elasticity, degree of graphitization and morphology (as indicated by the dimension ratio). These characteristics are discussed in more detail below.
    Porosimetertest:
    Porosimeter testing involves introducing a high pressure non-wetting fluid (often mercury) into a material using a porosimeter. The pore size can be determined on the basis of the external pressure needed to force the liquid into a pore against the opposite force from the surface tension of the liquid.
    A force balance equation known as Washburn's equation for the above materials with cylindrical pores is given as:
    where DP is the pore size, o is the surface tension of mercury and Θ is the contact angle. Without getting into it, it is about mercury
    Referring to Table 1, samples of the improved RGC of the present specification (designated "HR") and the known material (designated "SS") with comparable particle size distributions (as determined by Microtrac analysis) were tested for their porosity. Testing was performed according to ISO 15901-1 and started at 0.52 psi with a maximum pressure measured at 70,000 psi. Liquid mercury was pressed into the pores with hydraulic force. The amount of mercury taken up in the pores was measured as a function of pressure. With the increased pressure, more and more mercury is pushed into the pores of the sample material. From the pressure data, the pore size is calculated. As a result, pore volume information is obtained as a function of pore size. TABLE 1
    From the data it is seen that at the same size the HR material gives greater total pore volume. For example, HR10 has a porosity of 52%, while SS10 has a porosity of 45%. Of the logarithmic difference of pore volume vs. pore size indicates that the information collected at pore size greater than 1 µm or pressure lower than ca. 200 psi is irrelevant to the determination of porosity as they are related to the space between the particles. Table 2 below only considers data related to a pore size less than 0.35 µm: TABLE 2
    While the porosity values in Table 2 are questionable with respect to some of the out-of-range skeletal density values, the remainder of Table 2 is believed to be quite accurate.
    From Table 2 it can be concluded that the HR materials have a higher total fine porosity than the SS materials with a comparable particle size distribution. Furthermore, the larger the particle size, the higher the overall porosity, and all HR materials have larger pores than the SS materials. All HR materials have a mean pore diameter greater than 0.0388 µm, while all SS materials have an average pore size less than 0.0300 µm.
    elasticity Test
    Elasticity tests are described in the '669 patent introduced by reference herein. As described herein, elasticity can be determined using a press at which pressure is applied to a non-compressed material sample and released. More specifically, a sample cylinder or die is charged with a dry and free-flowing amount of the material to be tested. The test cylinder is then mounted on a press. With the press, pressure is applied to the sample (to 10,000 psi) and the height (hQ) of the compressed sample inside the test cylinder is measured. The pressure is then removed and the recovered height (hr) of the sample inside the test cylinder is measured 10 minutes after the pressure is removed, and then again at 20 minutes to ensure that the sample has stabilized. The elasticity (%) is then calculated as 100x (hr / h0 - 1).
    The graphitization line and dimension ratio
    The degree of graphitization of carbon and graphite products is measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD). It is calculated using the following formula:
    where g is the degree of graphitization (%) and d002 is the interlayer distance deduced by XRD.
    The dimension ratio is the ratio of the width to the height of a particle. Images of individual particles were recorded and analyzed to determine the dimensional relationship of the product. Dimensional ratio measurement is an image analysis service commercially offered by Microtrac Inc (DIA). Thus, an improved, highly elastic graphite-shaped carbon material is described which is particularly suitable for use as a drilling fluid additive. The highly elastic graphite is made from calcined oil coke, which is heat treated using a continuous thermal purification process in a fluidized bed. The resulting material has a degree of graphitization greater than 85% as measured by d002 using XRD (compared to the degree of graphitization of known products less than 80%). Furthermore, the resulting material develops a high degree of microporosity, which is characterized by greater pore diameter as measured by mercury porosimetry test methods. Specifically, the mean pore diameter (micropore, <1 µm) relative to the volume of this highly elastic graphite is greater than 0.035 µm, regardless of particle size. In addition, the high elastic graphite has elasticity levels in excess of 130% (while known products generally have an elasticity less than 130%).
    Particle size Ford Lina
    The highly elastic graphite has a particle size greater than approx. 10 µm in d50 and less than 2380 µm (mesh 8) to be large enough to form an effective formulation with other mud components such as barite but not too large to clog drilling tools.
    权利要求:
    Claims (1)
    [1]
    1. Elastic graphite carbon particle material characterized by having a d50 particle size between 10 µm and 2380 µm; an elasticity with more than approx. 130% rebound after compression at 68,948 kPa (10,000 psi); a graphization rate greater than 85% measured at d002 using XRD; an average pore size greater than 0.035 µm and a dimension ratio of the pores less than 0.63.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    Kang et al.2016|Impact of fracturing fluid on multi-scale mass transport in coalbed methane reservoirs
    MXPA04006964A|2004-12-06|Lost circulation compositions.
    DK201600127Y3|2017-02-24|Tabscirkulering drilling fluid additive to the wellbore and gain
    WO2006040578A1|2006-04-20|Lost circulation additive for drilling fluids
    EP2142760A1|2010-01-13|High pressure fracture tester
    EP3087154A1|2016-11-02|Compressible carbonaceous particulate material and method of making same
    AU2014296054B2|2017-10-26|Proppants and anti-flowback additives including kaolin clay
    Medhi et al.2020|Zirconium oxide nanoparticle as an effective additive for non-damaging drilling fluid: A study through rheology and computational fluid dynamics investigation
    Hettama et al.2007|Development of an innovative high-pressure testing device for the evaluation of drilling fluid systems and drilling fluid additives within fractured permeable zones
    ETTEHADI et al.2017|Extending thermal stability of calcium carbonate pills using sepiolite drilling fluid
    RU2015113044A|2016-10-27|PARTICLES OF THE PROPELLING AGENT FORMED FROM A DROP SUSPENSION AND THE METHOD OF THEIR APPLICATION
    Soares et al.2020|Effect of solid particle size on the filtration properties of suspension viscosified with carboxymethylcellulose and xantham gum
    CN108728064A|2018-11-02|A kind of drilling fluid aluminium base closure inorganic agent and preparation method thereof
    Liang et al.2014|The study of nano sealing to improve the brittle shale wellbore stability under dynamic load
    WO2015047908A1|2015-04-02|Lightweight proppants for hydraulic fracturing
    CN104419388B|2018-07-20|Inlay shielding drilling fluid
    CN103881669B|2016-08-17|A kind of complex salt aqueous drilling fluid
    Liu et al.2012|Effectiveness of polymers on improving the fluid loss of bentonite used in geosynthetic clay liners
    Kartnaller et al.2017|Laser beam backscattering as a new tool to study the effect of inhibitors on shale particles-water interactions: A real-time analysis
    Su et al.2019|Laboratory Study on a New Composite Plugging Material with High Bearing Strength and High-Temperature Resistance
    Kanjirakat et al.2020|INFLUENCE OF CNT-NANOPARTICLES IN THE FILTRATE CHARACTERISTICS AND FILTER CAKE FORMATION OF A WATER-BASED DRILLING FLUID
    Zhou et al.2014|Research on the corrosion mechanism of CO2/H2S mixture to cement stone
    Wen et al.2017|Characteristics of Nanoscale Pore of Tight Sand Reservoir and Its Relation to Hydrocarbon Occurrence
    Bybee2008|Optimized solids control provides opportunities for drilling depleted reservoirs
    Ponmani et al.2019|Improvement of Anti-Sag and Rheological Properties of Water Based Muds Using Nano-Barite
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    EP2970743A1|2016-01-20|
    DE202014010852U1|2016-11-17|
    CA2903722C|2019-09-24|
    DK201600127Y3|2017-02-24|
    SA515361056B1|2016-08-14|
    US8999898B2|2015-04-07|
    US20140274816A1|2014-09-18|
    CA2903722A1|2014-09-18|
    MX2015012262A|2016-06-02|
    WO2014143554A1|2014-09-18|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US2329878A|1941-03-14|1943-09-21|Graphite Frees Company|Drilling fluid and the method of drilling and lubricating wells|
    US2667224A|1949-06-29|1954-01-26|Stanolind Oil & Gas Co|Well completion process|
    US2912380A|1953-07-17|1959-11-10|American Viscose Corp|Drilling fluids and method of preventing loss thereof from well holes|
    US3385789A|1964-03-05|1968-05-28|Charles M. King|Composition and method for shale control|
    US3444276A|1966-04-04|1969-05-13|Dow Chemical Co|Method for producing carbon-bonded graphite structures|
    US3807961A|1970-02-24|1974-04-30|Superior Graphite Co|Apparatus for high-temperature treatment of petroleum coke|
    CA1091895A|1975-07-01|1980-12-23|William M. Goldberger|Method and apparatus for heat treating carbonaceous material in a fluidized bed|
    US4069870A|1976-06-28|1978-01-24|Union Oil Company Of California|Method of cementing well casing using a high temperature cement system|
    US4088583A|1976-12-02|1978-05-09|Union Oil Company Of California|Composition and method for drilling high temperature reservoirs|
    US4123367A|1977-04-29|1978-10-31|Dodd Anita A|Method of reducing drag and rotating torque in the rotary drilling of oil and gas wells|
    US4531594A|1982-10-25|1985-07-30|Venture Chemicals, Inc.|Method and compositions for fluid loss and seepage loss control|
    US4501329A|1983-04-18|1985-02-26|Chevron Research Company|Non-abrasive particulate material for permeability alteration in subsurface formations|
    US4957174A|1989-06-29|1990-09-18|Conoco Inc.|Method of controlling lost circulation in well drilling|
    NL9001145A|1990-05-16|1991-12-16|Norman Laurie Jacobs|LUBRICANT.|
    US5118664A|1991-03-28|1992-06-02|Bottom Line Industries, Inc.|Lost circulation material with rice fraction|
    ZA929373B|1991-12-06|1993-06-02|Chem Services|Drilling mud additive.|
    US5211250A|1992-01-21|1993-05-18|Conoco Inc.|Method for stabilizing boreholes|
    EG21132A|1995-12-15|2000-11-29|Super Graphite Co|Drilling fluid loss prevention and lubrication additive|
    US5839520A|1996-10-03|1998-11-24|Maillet; Bonnie Blue|Method of drilling well bores|
    US5843872A|1997-11-19|1998-12-01|Sun Drilling Products Corp|Drilling fluid system and related methods|
    US5942467A|1997-12-08|1999-08-24|Sun Drilling Products Corporation|Drilling fluid system containing a combination of hydrophilic carbon black/asphaltite and a refined fish oil/glycol mixture and related methods|
    US6461999B1|2001-03-28|2002-10-08|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture|Starch-containing lubricant systems for oil field applications|
    US7066285B2|2002-01-16|2006-06-27|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Method and composition for preventing or treating lost circulation|
    US7087555B2|2003-04-07|2006-08-08|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Drilling fluids comprising sized graphite particles|
    US20060122070A1|2003-04-07|2006-06-08|Baker Hughes Incorporated|Drilling fluid systems comprising sized graphite particles|
    US7284611B2|2004-11-05|2007-10-23|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Methods and compositions for controlling lost circulation in subterranean operations|
    CN101128312B|2005-02-25|2010-09-29|高级石墨公司|Graphite coating of particulate materials|
    TWI399354B|2007-06-07|2013-06-21|Ibiden Co Ltd|Graphite material and a method of producing graphite material|
    US20090075847A1|2007-09-14|2009-03-19|Wawrzos Frank A|Drilling fluid lubricant and method of use|
    US8043997B2|2008-02-29|2011-10-25|Halliburton Energy Services Inc.|Lost circulation material formulation and method of use|WO2016093832A1|2014-12-11|2016-06-16|Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.|Resilient carbon-based materials as lost circulation materials and related methods|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US13/836,636|US8999898B2|2013-03-15|2013-03-15|Drilling fluid additive for loss circulation and wellbore strengthening|
    [返回顶部]